Legal Opinion

Harwood-Nebel Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 5, 1945No. 44587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered tne opinion of the court:

Pursuant to defendant’s invitation for bids of October 3,. 1936, on the basis of certain detailed specifications and drawings dated September 30, 1936, and the acceptance of plaintiff’s bid of $141,377, plaintiff and the defendant entered into- and executed the Standard Government Contract for Construction, Form 23, on February 24-, 1937, for the construction by plaintiff of an extension to the building of the Capitol Power Plant to house certain refrigeration machinery and. equipment in connection with the air conditioning systems in. *157the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Langevin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  5. Henry Ericsson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Pfotzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. J. J. Kelly Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Bell BCI Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. J. J. Kelly Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API