Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1943No. 44581PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, Judge
The plaintiffs as trustees for the stockholders of B. & R. Company, Inc., successors to Bates & Rogers Construction Company, instituted this suit to recover excess costs caused by delay in furnishing rights-of-way and easements for the construction of a dam on the Tuscarawas River near Dover, Ohio. The delay is alleged to have been the fault of the defendant.
Bates & Rogers Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as the contractor, agreed for an estimated consideration of $957,262 to furnish all labor and materials and perform all work required for the construction of the Dover *405Dam,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
- Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
- L. L. Hall Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- McGuire & Hester v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. Wilmington Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Metropolitan Paving Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.