Legal Opinion
Langevin v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 3, 1943No. 43903PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiff seeks to recover (1) for damages for delays caused by defendant; (2) for liquidated damages deducted; and (3) for the cost of putting on a copper roof.
Plaintiff had a contract for the construction of a Post Office at Weston, West Virginia. It was to be constructed under the supervision of Stephen W. Ford, an architect of Clarksburg, West Virginia, who was authorized to prepare all drawings and specifications, to pass on all shop drawings, to approve or reject architectural samples and all ornamental work, colors, and finishes. Mr. Ford severed his connection with the work on June…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Plato v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
3Cited by24 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Kehm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Cannon Construction Company, Inc., Ed. J. Kearns, Company, Incorporated v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.