Legal Opinion
Bell BCI Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 13, 2003No. 03-796CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff Bell BCI filed a bid protest challenging a contract award by the Architect of the Capitol. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). The Government contends that this court cannot review procurement decisions by the Architect of the Capitol because that office is not a Federal agency, and that the Architect is a part of the Legislative Branch. Defendant has not established that the Architect is not a Federal agency for jurisdictional purposes, or that this court’s Tucker Act jurisdiction would be foreclosed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States and Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Hubbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blue Water Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Fru-Con Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- US Securities Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.