Legal Opinion
Pfotzer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 25, 1948No. 46075PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
The plaintiff partnership, E. & E. J. Pfotzer, seeks to recover a total of $23,-746 on seven separate alleged causes of action under a unit price and lump sum construction contract with defendant.
Prior to May 7, 1942, the Government, through the U.S. Engineer Office, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Mobile, Alabama, prepared detailed specifications, schedules and drawings for additional housing, technical, and hospital construction, including utilities, at Brookley Field, Mobile Air Depot Groups, at Mobile, Alabama. In addition, the district engineer prepared the “Standard…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- The Jack Stone Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- International Potato Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Gemsco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.