Legal Opinion

Shintaffer v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4640PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This action is in the nature of a hill of interpleader filed by plaintiff George C. Shintaffer to determine conflicting claims to a one-fourth portion of the wheat crop grown and harvested by him during the year 1930 on land in Sutter County leased from defendant Henry D. Hook, under a lease providing for delivery of one-fourth of the wheat crop to the lessor. By consent a judgment for one-third of said one-fourth portion of the crop was awarded to Ellis Hook, an incompetent person, who owned an undivided one-third interest in the leased property and did not join in the execution of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Locke v. KlunkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cacho v. BoudreauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Silveira v. OhmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. StaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Clark v. CuinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API