Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Cobb

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1898No. Sac. No. 351PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

W. J. Clarke and plaintiffs and appellants, executors of the estate of W. J. Clarke, deceased, respectively entered into contracts with one Cobh, whereby said Cobb agreed to farm and cultivate certain lands to grapes and grain for a term of years. For present purposes these contracts were the same, and it was provided therein that the lands were demised and let to said Cobb, he agreeing to give annually for the use thereof a certain portion of the crops of grain and other products grown thereon. At the time these contracts were entered into mortgage liens rested upon the realty. Subsequently,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernal v. HoviousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Walls v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Reynolds v. LathropCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re OkaharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Curtner v. LyndonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API