Legal Opinion

Silveira v. Ohm

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1949No. Sac. 5858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

On January 30, 1939, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written agreement for the sale and lease of farm land. The agreement recited that defendants were the owners of 314.376 acres of land; that plaintiffs agreed to purchase 224 acres thereof designated as Parcels I and II and to lease an additional 86.376 acres described as Parcel III; and that defendants retained four acres. With respect to Parcel III the agreement provided that the “Sellers do hereby lease to Buyers and Buyers do hereby lease from Sellers for a period of five (5) years from and after October 24, 1938, Parcel III of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Washington International Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Dameshghi v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Carey v. Glenco Citrus ProductsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API