Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Harlow

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1903No. S.F. No. 2294PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is a purchaser of the mortgaged premises at a sale, under a judgment entered April 7, 1899, in the case of the Farmers and Merchants' Savings Bank of Oakland against Thomas Conway, Emma Crothers, et al., foreclosing a mortgage of Conway of date March 19, 1896, and is the holder of a certificate of sale of that date in due form. The suit was commenced December 29, 1898. The defendant is the commissioner who made the sale. Emma, or Mrs. Crothers, defendant in the foreclosure suit, is the assignee of a sheriff's certificate of sale, of date December 8, 1898, duly made to one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Simpson v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Duff v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Steinour v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API