Legal Opinion

First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Staley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 14084PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this cause, plaintiff, a personal representative of the mortgagee, by due proceedings" in foreclosure, caused to be sold at a regular sale the premises in dispute and became the purchaser thereof on behalf of his testate on October 29, 1932, and the time for redemption will expire on October 29, 1933. Appellant Nicoll holds the legal title to said property through mesne conveyances from the original mortgagor. She was the sole defendant in the foreclosure proceeding. The property involved is in San Diego and consists of a large lot on which are located some seven or eight tenements which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Reidy v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Shintaffer v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McClintock v. PowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re RichterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Comstock v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Local Realty Co. v. Lindquist Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Petersen v. JurrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API