Legal Opinion

Cowdery v. London Etc. Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1903No. S.F. No. 2423PublishedCited by 77 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The two principal questions presented, generally stated, are,—1. Whether or not a reversal of a decree of foreclosure, with directions to the court below to enter a judgment in conformity with the opinion of the appellate court, vacates the decree and affects a sale made under it, where the only change ordered was the deduction of about one thousand dollars from the sum declared due, leaving a balance larger than the purchase price of the land at the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Barnhart v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Reynolds v. PeglerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API