Legal Opinion
R. F. Daddario & Sons, Inc. v. Shelansky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 14, 2010No. AC 30802PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendants Ira N. Shelansky and Linda J. Shelansky 1 appeal from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered in favor of the plaintiff, R. F. Daddario & Sons, Inc. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) determined that the plaintiff had standing to bring this action, (2) determined that the plaintiffs delay in foreclosing the mortgage did not indicate an intent to abandon the mortgage or bar its action under the doctrine of laches, (3) failed to find that the defendants were under duress when they signed the subject note and mortgage and that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glotzer v. KeyesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tarpon Bay Partners LLC v. Zerez Holdings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Hirsch v. WoermerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. v. FitzpatrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. TarziaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Emerick v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.