Emerick v. Town of Glastonbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The self-represented plaintiff, Roger Emerick, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendant, the town of Glastonbury (town). The plaintiff sought to prevent the demolition of the former Slocomb Mill located on town property. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) improperly granted the town’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs action on the ground of mootness, (2) improperly failed to award him punitive damages for the town’s conduct in demolishing the mill while his action was pending, and (3) violated his due process rights by…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sadloski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Burton v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Federal National Mortgage Assn. v. Bridgeport Portfolio, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Fredo v. FredoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Prange v. ArszylaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024