Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. v. Fitzpatrick
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 2019No. AC41113PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.
The defendants, James R. Fitzpatrick and Marsha A. Fitzpatrick, 1 appeal from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) denied their motion to dismiss and rendered judgment of foreclosure by sale because the plaintiff did not comply with the terms of the note and mortgage, namely, compliance with the notice requirements, and (2) concluded that the defendants had not proved their special defense of laches. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Ass'n v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Emigrant Mortg., Co., Inc. v. D'AgostinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. CondronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. GodutoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- OneWest Bank, N.A. v. CeslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- 50 Waterville Street Trust, LLC. v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Bank of New York Mellon v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.