Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Woermer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 11, 2018No. AC40653PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.
The defendant, William S. Woermer, appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Sandra M. Hirsch, Trustee. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) granted the plaintiff's motion to strike his special defense of unconscionability and (2) denied his motion to open. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. The plaintiff holds a note from the defendant, which is now in default, for the original principal amount of $73,200…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Boucher Agency, Inc. v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tarpon Bay Partners LLC v. Zerez Holdings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Bank of America, N.A. v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Rockstone Capital, LLC v. CaldwellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Anthis v. WindomConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.