Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Tarzia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 1, 2019No. AC40229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

This is the third appeal in this foreclosure action to reach this court in the nearly ten years this matter has been litigated. The named defendant Joseph S. Tarzia 1 appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to open and vacate the court's judgment of strict foreclosure. Although the self-represented 2 defendant's appellate brief is not a model of clarity, we construe his claims to be that the court (1) erred by denying his motion to open and vacate based on new evidence of fraud, (2) erred by concluding that the plaintiff possessed the note when it filed this foreclosure action,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. John R. Yarnevic v. Brink's, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation Thomas R. FussnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. In re Diet DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Niagara Bank, N.A. v. PounceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Moore v. FergusonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. 62-64 Bank Street, LLC v. AmelioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Joseph S. Tarzia v. Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  5. Speer v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API