Legal Opinion
Lincoln v. Hoggard
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 1924No. Civ. No. 3983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for breach of a contract arising out of an alleged failure to keep a certain covenant in a lease between them as follows:
“If the Lessor wishes to cancel the lease and gain possession of the property the Lessee agrees to accept $3.00 per acre for such land as he has plowed and seeded or $2.50 per acre for land that is plowed but not seeded. At any time up to and withinp 60 days of the time of harvest. Within 60 days of time of harvest the Lessee will be allowed to harvest his crop. After harvesting of the crop and up into the time of the spring or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Furlong v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- United States Trading Corp. v. Newmark Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Sharp v. PitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Reed v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cullinan v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Miller v. Ambassador Park SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Davis v. MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927