Legal Opinion

Davis v. Monte

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1927No. Docket No. 3144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCK, J., pro tem.

Action in replevin based upon the provisions of a chattel mortgage given by defendants to plaintiff.

The mortgage in question was given as the sole consideration for the sale by plaintiff to defendants of eighteen-head of dairy cattle, and covered not only the cattle sold, but also eleven other head owned by the defendants. By way of answer the defendants relied on their cross-complaint, wherein they seek to rescind and set aside the mortgage, so far as it pertains to the eleven head of cattle, upon the ground that the plaintiff procured and brought about the sale through…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Furla v. Jon Douglas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. H. W. Smith, Inc. v. SwensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Russell v. RoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. A. Hamburger & Sons, Inc. v. LemboeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API