Furlong v. White
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Alan C. Van Fleet, Jerome D. Peters, H. F. Chadbourne, John S. Partridge and Charles A. Christin for Appellant. Guy R. Kennedy, W. H. Carlin, U. S. Webb, Attorney General, and Frank English, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to compel defendant White to account to plaintiff for a one-half interest in the profits ensuing from the sale of certain property in Butte County, known as the Lott ranch. The judgment, from which the appeal is taken, was in favor of all the defendants, but it may be stated that it is not disputed that the decision is correct as to the defendants other than said White.
The complaint alleges that by virtue of certain instruments in writing, dated January 2, January 15, and March 12, 1917, constituting virtually the same contract, one Lott, who was the owner of said property,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Sara D.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Daily v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.