Legal Opinion
Cullinan v. Mercantile Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1926No. Docket No. 5472PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action by respondents to establish the reasonable value of services rendered for the benefit of a trust estate, to charge the amount thereon, and for a decree directing payment from the trust funds.
On or about May 24, 1916, Daniel A. McColgan, a money broker, with whom appellant Reginald McColgan was in partnership, loaned to California Motion Picture Corporation the sum of $26,000, the aggregate of various sums advanced by himself, the partnership mentioned, and George L. Crabtree, Reginald Bell, C. H. Williams, and Nellie McM. Donovan. The loan was evidenced by promissory notes executed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Jessup v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- New v. . NicollNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Skopp v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pas v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.