Legal Opinion

Reed v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1900No. S.F. No. 1328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The judgment in this case was entered April 30, 1897. Subsequently, defendant moved fór a new trial on a bill of exceptions, which was denied. Thereupon the defendant appealed from the judgment and from said order denying a new trial, January 4, 1898. The appeal from the order was dismissed April 4, 1898, and a rehearing denied April 30, 1898.

The appeal from the judgment having been taken more than sixty days after the rendition thereof, it must be considered and determined upon the judgment-roll alone, without reference to the question whether the evidence was sufficient to support the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hutchings v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. F. A. Hihn Co. v. FlecknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reiniger v. HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Miller v. Ambassador Park SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Rossiter v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Lincoln v. HoggardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Los Angeles Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Television Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API