Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Gohransen

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1891No. 13114PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appeal in this case is direct from the judgment upon the judgment roll alone. The appellant seeks its reversal upon the ground that the court below did not make findings upon all the issues in the case. The complaint is in the ordinary form of a complaint in ejectment. The answer denies its several allegations, alleges title in the defendant, pleads the statute of limitations, and sets up an equitable defense. The court found only the facts which were alleged in the complaint, and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

In Himmelman v. Henry, 84 Cal. 104, it was held that “a failure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hutchings v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dolliver v. DolliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API