Legal Opinion
Sharp v. Pitman
California Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1913No. L.A. No. 3190PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELLOTTI, J,
This is an appeal by defendants from .an order denying their motion for a new trial.
On' June 6, 1910, plaintiff and defendant Susie B. Pitman entered into a written contract wherein the latter agreed to pay plaintiff one thousand two hundred dollars in installments of four hundred dollars each, and pledged to him as security for the payment thereof a note of defendant W. H. Pitman of even date for one thousand six hundred and fifty dollars and interest, and a mortgage given her by said W. H. Pitman on the same date to secure the payment of said note, the same covering certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Langford v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Russell v. Riley & PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.