Flexible Metal Hose Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This Government contract case involves review, under the standards of the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-22 (1976), of a decision by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Board of Contract Appeals (Board). NASA BCA No. 378-2, 79-1 BCA (CCH) ¶ 13,765 (1979).
The case involves the installation of a cryogenic piping system used in the Space Shuttle’s main propulsion system. The dispute arose from the need by the plaintiff to place insulation on the piping in order to meet NASA heat leak specifications. The plaintiff sought additional compensation for *524the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Ordnance Research, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson-Sharpe Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- McCollum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- M.G. Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993