Legal Opinion
McCollum v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 4, 1984No. 346-82CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Judge.
Plaintiff Paul E. McCollum, Sr., seeks review under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1976), of a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), ASBCA No. 23269, 81-2 BCA ¶ 15,311. The case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The stated facts are findings of the Board or otherwise properly derived from the administrative record. See Ordnance Research, Inc. v. United States, 609 F.2d 462, 465, 221 Ct.Cl. 641 (1975).
Background
The facts are fully presented in two Board decisions. Paul E. McCollum, Sr., ASBCA No. 23269, 81-2…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Max Drill, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- J.F. Shea Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- White Buffalo Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- North Slope Technical Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.