Legal Opinion
M.G. Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 4, 2005No. 04-473CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The plaintiff, M.G. Construction, Inc., is an Oregon corporation based in Salem, Oregon. The ease arises out of a United States Air Force roof repair and construction contract at the Francis E. Warren Air Force Base in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Initially, when the complaint in the case was filed, only count one of the plaintiffs complaint had been submitted to the contracting officer. The remaining five counts had not been presented to the contracting officer. See 41 U.S.C. § 605(a) (2000) (“All claims by a contractor against the government relating to a contract shall be in…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Glenn Defense Marine (Asia) PTE, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hoag v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011