Legal Opinion

Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 19, 1968No. 300-65PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SKELTON, Judge.

This is a suit to recover claims based on the termination for convenience by the government of two cost-plus-fixed fee (CPFF) contracts. The defendant awarded contract number AF 04(645)-27 (hereinafter referred to as contract 27) to American Machine and Foundry Company (hereinafter called AMF) for research, development, and design of an accessory power system (APS) for the Atlas Missile for an estimated $5,930,-539.25, on July 19, 1956. A second contract was awarded to this company on February 14, 1957,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API