Legal Opinion

Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 1, 1993No. 90-3942LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This contract case is before the court after a trial on the merits. Plaintiffs are successors-in-title to Navy surplus real property and seek compensation from defendant for the alleged violation of the terms of the property’s deed. Defendant counters that it has not violated the deed’s terms as the original contracting parties intended the terms to be read.

Factual Background1

Plaintiffs, Coggeshall Development Corporation (Coggeshall Development) and Coggeshall Marina, Inc. (Coggeshall Marina), are Rhode Island business corporations. Defendant is the United States, acting…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. City of Gettysburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API