Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This contract case is before the court after a trial on the merits. Plaintiffs are successors-in-title to Navy surplus real property and seek compensation from defendant for the alleged violation of the terms of the property’s deed. Defendant counters that it has not violated the deed’s terms as the original contracting parties intended the terms to be read.
Factual Background1
Plaintiffs, Coggeshall Development Corporation (Coggeshall Development) and Coggeshall Marina, Inc. (Coggeshall Marina), are Rhode Island business corporations. Defendant is the United States, acting…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- City of Gettysburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005