Legal Opinion
Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 16, 1973No. 412-65PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkeltoN, Judge
*60Tn this case the plaintiff, Dale Ingram, Inc. (formerly Florida Builders, Inc.), contends that two decisions of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board), one on liability and one on quantum, are erroneous as a matter of law and are not supported by substantial evidence. The plaintiff also seeks reformation of the contract on the ground of mistake.
The contract in question was one for Capehart housing construction upon land in Florida that had been under water and had to be filled in before the housing could be constructed. The land fill was to be accomplished by a different…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Edward R. Marden Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Federal-Mogul Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Pacific Architects & Engineers Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.