Legal Opinion
Occhino v. Grover
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 12, 2002No. C6-01-1216PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Russell Grover, holding that Minn.Stat. § 504B.255 (2000) did not require Grover to provide a one-year notice before terminating Richard Occhi-no’s Section 8 tenancy. Occhino appeals, and, because we conclude that the district court properly applied the statute, we affirm.
FACTS
Richard Occhino is disabled by epilepsy and has received social-security disability income since 1969. His limited income qualifies him for tenant-based government-housing assistance under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- First National Bank of the North v. Automotive Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Edwards v. HOPKINS PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Schug v. Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars & Fifty Cents in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Swenson v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.