Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
This case requires us to examine the scope of Minn.Stat. § 145.64, subd. 2 (1998), the provider data exception to the privilege provision of Minnesota’s review organizations statute, Minn.Stat. §§ 145.61-67 (1998). Appellants, Dr. Michael A. Amaral and Dr. Dan E. Miulli, are physicians with staff privileges at respondent, The Saint Cloud Hospital. The two physicians requested information about themselves from certain of the hospital’s medical peer review organizations. The hospital refused their request, stating that the information sought was confidential…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.