Legal Opinion

Edwards v. HOPKINS PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIP

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 2010No. A09-1616PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Jimmie Edwards challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents Hopkins Plaza Limited Partnership and Stuart Management Corporation on his claims of discrimination relating to real property under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA). Appellant argues that respondents discriminated against him by (1) refusing to rent to him based on his status with regard to public assistance; (2) quoting a higher rent price to him based on his status with regard to public assistance; and (3) failing to reasonably accommodate his disability.

FACTS

Respon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Cummings v. KoehnenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nicole Dussault v. RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Fletcher Properties, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  5. Lopez v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API