Legal Opinion

American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 2001No. C1-00-786PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

We must decide whether appellant, City of Grant (City), complied with the requirements contained in Minn.Stat. § 15.99 (2000) in denying respondent’s request for a conditional use permit (CUP) more than 60 days after receiving respondent’s written request. We hold that the City did not comply with the statutory requirements and affirm the court of appeals for the reasons stated below. «

Respondent, American Tower, is a limited partnership engaged in the business of constructing communications towers for lease by providers of wireless digital telephone and pager…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API