Legal Opinion
Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 2003No. CX-02-1603PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
On cross-motions for summary judgment in a dispute involving allegations of nuisance, negligence, and trespass against a confined-animal feeding operation, the district court granted summary judgment for Jerome, Alma, and James Forst, Forst Farms, Inc., and Wakefield Pork, Inc. The district court did not decide the summary judgment motion of Gerald and Julie Wen-dinger on the issue of agency. The Wen-dingers appeal, and we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Julie and Gerald Wendinger own land in rural Nicollet County near a confined-animal feeding operation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Babb v. Lee County Landfill SC, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. Werner EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.