Legal Opinion

Olson v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1997No. C5-96-915PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This case comes to us on an Order of Certification issued by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 480.061 (1996) (Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act). The certified question is as follows:

Does Minn.Stat. § 169.685, subd. 4, bar the introduction of evidence of the plaintiffs personal seat belt use in a crashworthiness action alleging the seat belt, itself, was negligently designed or manufactured?

We answer the question in the affirmative.

I

On December 30, 1993, Kyle Olson was injured when the 1985 Ford…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Lovett v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Estep v. Mike Ferrell Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API