de la Cuesta v. Benham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1290Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case tests the limits of a trial court’s discretionary authority to determine that there is no “prevailing party” under Civil Code section 1717. Here, a landlord brought an unlawful detainer action and sought unpaid rent. The tenant asserted she owed the landlord nothing because there were leaks in the premises. The day before the trial the tenant vacated the premises, so the case went to trial only on the landlord’s money claims. The landlord recovered 70 percent of what he claimed was owing. Nevertheless, the trial court ruled that there was no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Olive v. Gen. Nutrition Ctrs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cussler v. Crusader Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. S. Cal. Fin. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- David S. Karton, a Law Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Campagna v. Gatley Properties CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.