Legal Opinion

Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. S. Cal. Fin. Corp.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 5, 2018No. B276719PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

*195SUMMARY

Both plaintiff and defendant appeal from a postjudgment order concluding neither of them was the prevailing party in litigation *801over an assignment fee, and consequently neither of them was entitled to attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 ( section 1717 ) or to costs under Code of Civil Procedure section 1032 ( section 1032 ). We affirm the trial court's order.

FACTS

This is the fifth appeal in litigation over the assignment fee that began in 2006. Three of the previous appeals are pertinent in one way or another to this appeal, and we will describe them as needed.1 The history of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Meister v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olive v. Gen. Nutrition Ctrs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Bonacci v. Maranhas CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. City of L.A. Dept. of Airports v. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Dickerson v. Perry & Papenhausen, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Duff v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API