Legal Opinion

Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1999No. S057126PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

A party’s entitlement to attorney fees in a lawsuit based on a contract containing an attorney fees provision often depends not just upon the language of the contractual provision but also upon the complex interaction of several statutes that affect a party’s contractual right to attorney fees, as this case illustrates.

Here, plaintiff sued defendant for contract and tort claims; the contract included a unilateral attorney fees provision permitting defendant to recover its attorney fees if it sued to enforce the contract or to recover damages for its breach, but not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Berkla v. Corel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API