Legal Opinion
Cussler v. Crusader Entertainment, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 2012No. B230770; No. B232046PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
Defendant Crusader Entertainment, LLC, now known as Bristol Bay Productions (Crusader), and plaintiffs Clive Cussler and his affiliated entities (Cussler)1 each appeal a postjudgment order. There are three main issues on appeal. The first is whether the trial court abused its discretion by finding there was no prevailing party for purposes of awarding attorney fees. The second is whether the trial court abused its discretion by awarding Cussler 7 percent interest on restitution he recovered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 908. This statute provides for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- David S. Karton, a Law Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- American Diversified Properties v. RE/EX Valencia CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ayala Boring v. HPS Mechanical CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Modesto v. Dow Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.