Legal Opinion
Barnard v. Jamison
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1947No. Civ. 3195PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Two cases were brought by plaintiffs to recover money had and received by defendants, and to declare the rights of the parties under two conveyances of oil interests in real properties, and two oil leases now on the properties. The cases are consolidated on appeal. Plaintiffs recovered judgments and defendants have appealed.
The facts are not in dispute. Only questions of law were decided by the trial court and are argued here.
Max B. Jamison and Millie L. Jamison, his wife, were the owners of parcels of land in Fresno County which, prior to May 26, 1941, were under lease to the Richfield Oil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Little v. Mountain View Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Paddock v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Dupuy v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Greenleaf v. S. A. Camp Ginning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.