Legal Opinion

Little v. Mountain View Dairies, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950No. L. A. 20462PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In 1935 plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest in certain real property granted to defendant a limited interest in that property described as “Eight and one-third per cent (8-%%) of all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances, and minerals, in, under and/or which may be hereafter produced and saved from” the property. In 1945 plaintiffs leased the property to Loren L. Hillman, Inc., for the purpose of producing oil and gas. The lease reserved to plaintiffs as lessors a royalty of one-sixth of all oil produced and saved from the premises. The lease also provided in part as follows:

“10. In ease…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Watkins v. SlaughterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. KirtleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thornhill v. System Fuels, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ellerbee v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Miller v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API