Legal Opinion
Paddock v. Vasquez
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1953No. Civ. 19747PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for a declaration of his rights under a mineral deed, and dependent on the determination of his rights to recover money due.
On January 15, 1937, Anselmo M. Vasquez and Bertha R. Vasquez, being the owners of a parcel of realty, entered into an oil and gas lease of the realty with Ohio Oil Company, as lessee, by which Ohio agreed to pay the Vasquezes, as landowner’s royalty, the equal l/8th part (12%%) of the value of all oil, gas, and other hydrocarbon substances removed from the demised premises. On April 24, 1940, while the lease with Ohio was in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Hoffman v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Koenig v. Calcote Et Ux.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- King v. KuglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sharpe v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.