Legal Opinion

Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1943No. L. A. 17989PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— Plaintiffs brought this action to recover a share of the proceeds from the operation of certain oil wells and to obtain stock in the operating corporation. The facts set forth in the findings of the trial court are as follows: On or about July 1, 1934, John Austin and John Porter entered into an agreement for the acquisition of a lease on some thirty acres of oil-bearing land in Kern County owned by Julius Pried and the Merritt Annex Oil Company. They agreed that if Porter could obtain the lease in his own name for the equal benefit of himself and Austin, the latter would attempt to secure…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API