Legal Opinion
Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 22, 2001No. SC 16346PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This case requires us to determine whether the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the doctrine of collateral estoppel barred the defendant from establishing standing to apply for site plan approval. The trial court rendered judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’1 appeal, which claimed that the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Plainville (commission), improperly had granted site plan approval to the defendant, Plainville NWD Limited Partnership (partnership), for construction of a retail development on certain real property on which a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- O'CONNOR v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.