Harrold v. Barnum
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
January 7, 1907, one Scott McKay, having been theretofore elected county surveyor of Fresno county for a term of four years, qualified and assumed the duties of that office. He thereupon appointed the plaintiff deputy county surveyor, which appointment continued in force until June 1, 1907, when it was revoked. Thereafter, however, he was reappointed to the same position, qualified under the second appointment, and served for one month, whereupon he demanded of the county auditor (defendant) a warrant upon the treasury of said county for the sum of $100 as his salary for said month, being the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Kane v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Larew v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Withers v. StonestreetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- State ex rel. Polk v. GalushaNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Somers v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Younger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State ex rel. Gilbert v. Board of Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Bayley v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cunning v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Lungren v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.