Larew v. Newman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mariposa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel defendant, auditor of Mariposa County, to draw his warrant in favor of plaintiff for $837.50. In the court below judgment went for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment, upon the judgment roll alone.
The facts necessary to be here stated are these: W. D. Egenhoff, having in 1882 been elected superintendent of schools of said county, qualified and entered upon the duties of said office on the eighth day of January, 1883, and held the office until March 19, 1884, when he resigned. On said March 19th the plaintiff, by an order of the board…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Bashford v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Jackson v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Foreman v. People ex rel. McEwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Wilson v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.