Legal Opinion
Cunning v. County of Humboldt
California Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12586PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was instituted to establish as county charges several claims theretofore rejected either in whole or in part, by the board of supervisors of the defendant county. From the judgment entered upon a directed verdict the defendant appeals. The complaint consists of six separate causes of action, each for personal services alleged to have been performed and expenses incurred during the month of July, 1925—either by the plaintiff personally or his assignors—while assisting the district attorney of the defendant county in the detection of crime and the gathering of evidence to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- O'Connor v. WitherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bayley v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kohn v. National Film Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hicks v. Bd. of Supervisors of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Jach v. EdsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Skidmore v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.