Legal Opinion
Younger v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1979No. Civ. 16912PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
Since 1933, San Diego County has operated under a charter providing for “home rule.” (Approved by the Legislature Jan. 17, 1933, Stats. 1933, res. ch. 10, p. 2814; see Cal. Const., art. XI, §§ 3, 4; see also former art. XI, § IVi.) In November 1976 the voters of San Diego County amended the charter by adding section 14.1 which placed a limitation on the number of consecutive terms a county elective official could serve. The amendment provides that no person is eligible to serve more than three consecutive four-year terms or two consecutive six-year terms in the same…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hicks v. Bd. of Supervisors of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Dublin v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Board of Supervisors v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Curcini v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dutmer v. City of San Antonio, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.