Legal Opinion

Bayley v. Garrison

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1923No. S. F. No. 10512PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought by a deputy in the office of the county clerk of Alameda County whose position existed before the county clerk took office on January 6, 1919, but Whose compensation was increased by the legislature of 1921, during the term of the office of the county clerk. The point involved, as stated in the petitioner’s points and authorities, is as follows:1 “Iiis petition involves the question as to the right to increase the pay of existing deputies, during the term of the principal, in cases, where the principal at the commencement of his term was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Quernheim v. AsselmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Rumbold v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Matlack v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Southlands Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kratzer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Board of Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Cunning v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API