Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Polk v. Galusha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1905No. 14,256PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Okiginal application for a writ of mandamus to require respondent to place relator’s name on official ballot.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.

Since the adoption of the present constitution, the statutes as heretofore existing have, provided for the election of the judges of the supreme court, the regents of the uni\ersity, judges of the district courts, and county judges, all of whose terms of office are fixed by the fundamental law, at a general election held in November of the odd numbered years. The terms of the different offices named vary; some being for six, some for four, and some two years, begining on the first Thursday after the first Tuesday of January of the year next succeeding the time of the ('lection. It is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Goodin v. ThomanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. People Ex Rel. Joyce v. . BrundageNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. State ex rel. Dawson County v. Farmers & Merchants Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Withers v. StonestreetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Scottsbluff v. TiemannNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People ex rel. Holdom v. SweitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wilson v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Garrotto v. McManusNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Harrold v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API